About cheri

cheri

Location:

Not specified

Joined on:

03/17/08

• Shame on you

  Authored by akilmer - 3 votes

• Good? Not for the animals, or for me.

  Authored by alexiconartist - 2 votes

• not yet rated

  Magazine

  response to  Lindsay Utz, Morgan Currie, Ryan Jeffery, Eli Kaufman, Eric Zimmerman, and Noella Boudart's post Happy Meal

  Disgusted

  I have to agree with shewster and many of the other posts on this article. I was disgusted by the article, and even more disgusted when I came to the website to comment and found the video on the behind the scenes of the photoshoot. Sonja clearly wanted no part of that photo shoot, and was clearly scared before she even went onto the set. How can you glorify this inhumane/insane behavior, and then call it "pampering"? Cows don't understand flashing lights in their eyes.

  But the clincher was when I saw the banner ad by La-Cense Beef on your site advertising that grass-fed beef is greener. Now it all makes sense, GOOD is clearly being paid by a grass-fed beef company (which is also gross).

  Studies show that grass-fed beef actually creates more methane gas than corn-fed beef, and methane gas is one of the biggest contributors to global warming. So how is it actually greener? Corn obviously has its problems too, but saying grass-fed is greener is simply not true.

  Last year I sent two gift subscriptions out to colleagues thinking I was spreading GOOD into the world, but this has really left me feeling ashamed, and questioning the ethics the magazine now stands for. I won't be gifting GOOD again anytime soon.

  Comments (0)

  Commented on March 17, 2008 by - cheri

• Pampered? No, mutilated and killed.

  Authored by animalwritings - 3 votes

• Wait! Something's missing!

  Authored by BippityBoppityBoo - 4 votes

• Blood is still spilled

  Authored by shewster - 5 votes