On Fighting
U.S. Army Enlistment Rates
Over 12% of the U.S. population enlisted to fight in World War II. How do other conflicts compare? Check out our On Fighting Transparency.
Like this article? Tell the world It's Good!


Politics
Over 12% of the U.S. population enlisted to fight in World War II. How do other conflicts compare? Check out our On Fighting Transparency.
Like this article? Tell the world It's Good!
Make it GOOD! This will be posted to your personal blog too.
* Fields marked in red must be completed
not yet rated
It sad...
It's sad that people now a days don't want to fight for the country they live in, I think it should be mandatory that every person spend at least 2 years in the military.
Posted on March 5, 2008 — by Zigaroma
0 comments
1 vote
Its sad ...
why the fuck should I have to serve in the military for two years. IT's a horrible war, why should I waste my life , when we can send kids who don't have 60,000 for college off to war instead.
Posted on March 6, 2008 — by tstilz
2 comments
not yet rated
If not you, then who?
The thing is, the last thing the Pentagon wants is a draft. it's hard enough training and retaining folks who signed up in the first place — can you image a bunch of malcontents suiting up and getting in the way? "Stripes" was cute and all, but you don't really want them on the front line, even with their razzle-dazzle.
But at the same time, when point zero five percent of folks participate, and point zero five percent are contributing in any way, shape, or form, it's not good for public policy. If you don't pay, you don't play, and when we confuse "support" with "putting a yellow magnet on our cars," then we also lose track of the fact that the next generation is going to pay for this war (and current estimates are $50,000 per person, thanks to GWB's installment plan approach to financing OEF / OIF).
When there is no apparent cost, then both those who support and those who don't support the war get lost in the shuffle.
Posted on March 26, 2008 — by Opsimath
0 comments