Why China Matters #1
Because we’re less than five years from a new generation of Chinese leaders with whom a far stronger relationship may well be built.
China is on the verge of a generational leadership change that will profoundly shape its emergence as a global power over the next decade. America should take advantage of this new group’s eagerness to play an actively constructive role in international affairs.
To make clear how this would work, here’s a quick primer on the generations of Chinese leaders since 1949: Mao personified the first generation, Deng the second. Deng was followed by a third generation fronted by Jiang Zemin, China’s president and party boss across the 1990s. What’s important to note about the third generation is that this cohort was largely educated in the Soviet Union during the 1950s. The technocratic flavor of that formative experience emboldened these leaders to extend Deng’s economic reforms far deeper into Chinese society, even as the leaders steadfastly refused political liberalization.
That brings us to the current, or fourth, generation of leaders, represented by President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao, a risk-avoiding pair who have been quietly at the helm of “peacefully rising” China since 2002. Internally, their focus has been on harmonizing the huge imbalance between the booming coastal provinces and the left-behind rural poor of the interior.
Since 9/11, China has been almost invisible in international security affairs, essentially free riding on America’s vigorous prosecution of both radical Islam’s global insurgency and the so-called Axis of Evil, despite being a potentially key player. After all, China has long stood as North Korea’s patron and now emerges as a dynamic investor for energy and raw-materials providers throughout the Middle East and Africa.
But understand this: China’s fourth-generation leaders did not travel abroad in the 1960s for their college education, trapped as they were by the Cultural Revolution. So it’s hardly a surprise that these homebodies have proven reticent to step out internationally. But that’s changing as China’s fifth-generation leaders-in-waiting step into senior positions of power. Starting in the late 1970s, many of them were educated right here in the United States—the birthplace of today’s market-driven globalization. All but penciled in for future top slots last fall at the Communist Party’s supreme gathering, this group has already begun its years-long transition to rule, slated to begin officially in 2012. Increasingly, China’s next leadership generation speaks openly of the nation’s achievement of great power status.
How America engages China’s emerging elite in coming years could well determine—for good or ill—the lasting contours of the most important bilateral relationship of the 21st century. The scariest aspect to this relationship right now is that America’s economic interdependency with China vastly outweighs the two nations’ political and, more important, military connectivity. Bind America and China together, and globalization cannot be derailed. But set them persistently at odds, and that’s a recipe for unacceptable danger.
Why China Matters
Like this article? Tell the world It's Good!















1 vote
Rose colored blinders
I get the impression from this article that we're supposed to think of China as an opportunity to make lemonade from their lemons. We've been making lemonade this whole time and it's done nothing but harm to both countries.
This paints a picture of Deng as this great modernizer. Before Tiananmen Square they had a totalitarian government who to some extent provided food, housing, education, etc. to their subjects in exchange for a total illegitimate authority over their human rights. Then when it seemed the people might revolt or the international community could see an excuse to invade and colonize, they cut provisions to their subjects and said, "You're free because we're letting foreigners come and setup factories for you to work. Now pay for your own food and education and never mind all the property the party stole from you to fund killing your families.. and by the way we still have all the same authority over you." So some Chinese subjects thought they won a small battle because they were free to make a living, but now desperate to survive. It was no longer affordable for citizens to revolt against the oppression, and the international community had no more reason to pretend to be heroes because we could have all the benefits of a colonization without the initial military investment.
The idea that the international business community will demand more government transparency for citizen or worker rights is contradicted by all the examples of what is happening today. When the Chinese government violently forces people off their land so factories can be built or violently silences any demands for workers rights, it's at the benefit - and wouldn't doubt request - of the investing businesses. Those actions are directly resulting in higher profits, which is the #1 priority in business. It would not be in the best interest of any business to encourage any kind of worker, civil, or even human rights. To think they would do it out of the kindness of their hearts would be naive and ignoring history.
The comparison to the developing U.S. has one fatal flaw, the U.S. was not a totalitarian state which squashed all dissent. If every union leader and whistle blower disappeared into a re-education labor camp the U.S. standard of living never would have increased.
I agree that China matters, but not that we should stay course and encourage larger global partnerships. If we continue to grow our dependence on China our economy will continue to weaken, their people will stay oppressed, and their military will strengthen. What good will it do to be a allied with a country that feeds on it's own? Maybe we won't be swallowed up so quickly?
Maybe instead we stop feeding the beast so it stops growing, let them figure out their own social problems first.
Bottom line is we're supporting and profiting from an oppressive regime, how is that "good"?
Posted on April 10, 2008 — by starvinginhouston
1 comment
not yet rated
Response To 1st Commentator: Black Colored Blinders
Dear starvinginhouston: You can only see two colors: black or white, but turn a blind eye to all the rich hues in between. Many of the problems in China you mention do exist. But what about the good things? What about the benefits from cooperating and working together with China? What do you say to people who only point to Iraq and brand the USA as a single murderous entity who barges into another sovereign state under false pretext and kills and maimes? Would you say that is a balanced view of the United States? Because of your refusal to see the whole picture, what you are advocating is blind confrontation which will create your own worst enemies and lead to mutual injuries, or in the worst case, to war. The world has seen enough blood. Take off the black-colored blinders and see both good and bad. Work together for peace. Don't inflame yourself and others into a frenzy which will bring nothing but destruction!
By the way, while reading your comments, I can't help but feeling that what you are rehashing here is all the xenophobic mud created by biased Western media and governments who refuse to recognize changes that have been taking place in China for the last 30 years. Ever heard of brain washing? Judging from what you are saying here, they have done a good job!
Posted on April 30, 2008 — by yestopeace
1 comment